Skip to main content
LogReg
AboutContact
LogReg

Custom AI engineering and AI security — from the same senior team.

Sofia, Bulgaria
LinkedIn

Services

// AI-Native Engineering

  • AI-Native Engineering

// AI Security

  • AI Red Team
  • AI Defense
  • Safe AI Adoption

// Product Engineering

  • Product Engineering
  • Web Apps
  • Mobile Apps

Company

  • About Us
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies
Sister firm

For traditional cybersecurity — pentesting, SOC, NIS2 readiness — see our sister firm. baselineit.eu →

© 2026 LogReg OOD (EIK: TBD). All rights reserved.

Secured · SSL/TLS encryption
HomeAI SecurityAI red team.
§ 01 — AI SECURITY

AI red team.

Adversarial testing of the AI systems your org is shipping or running: prompt injection, agent tool-use abuse, ML pipeline tampering, training-data poisoning. Findings with verified reproduction and remediation guidance — for the threat surface a traditional pentest can't reach.

// Scope an engagement// Talk to an expert
§ 02 — THE REAL PROBLEM

Your network pentest came back clean. Your LLM agent gave away customer data on a crafted prompt.

Traditional pentests don't test AI systems — they don't know how. The threat surface for an agent in production isn't a network port; it's a prompt, a tool inventory, a grounding source, a training run. A clean network pentest plus an unreviewed AI feature is how breaches happen now. AI red-teaming is its own discipline: testing the agent's authority boundaries, the model's jailbreak resistance, the pipeline's tampering surface. Different attack model, different methodology, different evidence.

§ 03 — WHAT WE COVER

Six dimensions of a useful AI red-team engagement.

The threat surface for an AI system is structurally different from a classical app. These six show up in every engagement that delivered real findings.

// AI red-team coverage — every scope

  • [INV]AI inventory: what's deployed, what data and tools it touches
  • [INJ]Prompt injection — direct, indirect, and chained
  • [TOOL]Agent tool-use abuse and authority-scope escapes
  • [MODEL]Model jailbreak and evasion testing per system
  • [DATA]Training-data poisoning audit and grounding contamination
  • [PIPE]ML pipeline tampering surface and supply-chain review

// what a useful engagement delivers. anything less is jailbreak theater.

§ 04 — HOW WE DO IT

Three phases to findings that change behavior.

Reports that produce remediation, not PDFs that get archived. We measure success by fix rate, not finding count.

  1. /STEP/01

    Scope & threat model

    We agree on scope, rules of engagement, and reporting format. Threat model the AI surface: agents, models, training pipelines, grounding sources, tool inventories. Output: a prioritized target list ranked by data sensitivity, authority, and exposure.

  2. /STEP/02

    Test & exploit

    Systematic prompt injection, tool-abuse, exfiltration, and prompt-chaining tests against each prioritized system. Findings verified by reproduction; false positives filtered before they hit your inbox. Real-time escalation for critical findings — not at the end of the engagement.

  3. /STEP/03

    Report & retest

    Report includes verified reproduction, severity rationale, remediation guidance, and mappings to the EU AI Act risk categorization where relevant. Retest of remediated findings included at no extra cost. Optional: per-release engagements for AI systems on a high-change cadence.

§ 05 — FAQ

Questions we get about AI red-teaming

Have another question? Contact us
AI red-team slots open

Your AI surface expanded again this quarter. Has the test?

Free initial scoping — 30 minutes to tell you what's in scope, what a realistic timeline looks like, and what a useful AI red-team report should contain.

// Scope an engagement// Talk to an expert